NEW! Faster Search Option
Loading
Angled leg strength
I'm working on a table design and am trying to see if I can do angled legs like an 'x' withoout the top portion. (see photo). The table would function as a desk so I'm not trying to get to withstand a huge load but it should be sturdy.
Is there a way to calculate the strength of the table on side furthest from the legs? Or is this something that won't work.
Navigation
Recent Discussions
Lift mechanism needed 6 replies
Old plane vs new 7 replies
That "special" tool 6 replies
Buy American made 1 reply
Re: Holzman and Vega lathes 3 replies
Inca/Delta 20" Bandsaws 4 replies
Cast Iron Clamp 4 replies
Building a Floor Clook 1 reply
Music Boxes 1 reply
Star of David 3 replies
Hand Tool Grinding Angle Setups 11 replies
More Rust Hunter 1 reply
Lie-Nielsen Router Plane 3 replies
Regarding sharpening 2 replies
looking for lignum vitae mallet 28 replies
Best saw for dovetails 3 replies
Half lap joints 2 replies
Rolltop desk top 3 replies
Large Pins, small tails 4 replies
Adhesive to use for laminating MDF? 6 replies
Seasonal movement of Cherry 3 replies
Boxwood 5 replies
More on cutting thin cuts 4 replies
Can't see any videos 2 replies
Forced log-offs . . . again? 4 replies
Fix: Private Messaging Spam 13 replies
Get in touch with author 1 reply



cantilevered designs (post #169146, reply #1 of 2)
I'm not a structural engineer, but there are numerous examples of cantilevered desk designs. In general, I think you're dealing with some combination of "shear" strength, and "bearing" strength, depending on the design of the joinery. For example, if the primary leg is simply attached to the edge of the top, you're working only with the shear strength of the materials and/or the attachment hardware, dowels, etc. That is, how much force is required to split the components along grain lines, or shear off the hardware. If the leg is also inside a large dado in the edge of the top, bearing strength is added to the equation.
I have no idea of how to actually calculate the design strength, however. That would involve both calculations for the materials being used (e.g. oak vs. pine or poplar), and the joinery (e.g. glued faces, supplemented by screws, dowels, etc.).
Joints (post #169146, reply #2 of 2)
It has been too long since the structures classes, but this is wood. Wood is forgiving. I would suggest that you build one leg and test it yourself. See if the joints between the top, short leg and sloped leg works. Lean on it. It is going to bend, deflect as the engineers say. But how much is acceptable to you is the question.
I'm as much worried about the lateral stability, how you link the pair of legs so that it doesn't sway side to side. Once again it is the joints and how rigid you can make them that I see as more of a problem than the strength of the wood.
This sort of question could be analyzed by engineers and give you a bunch of probably answers, with safety factors for different species of wood. But the problem is usually solved in the old trial and error method. The Mexican architect Candella made some amazingly thin saddle shaped structures, some 1 cm think. How did he know they would work. He had his students form test structures and if they failed they made it thicker and learned. Then he built the churches. Math can get in the way. Make it , break it and let us know what you learned.
Peter